I think the main contributing factor to the accident was the approach and how it should not have been conducted at night. The article listed the pressure of clients in charter operations but both the pilots had exposure to this prior to the incident and most likely knew how to handle it. They picked a alternate in Rifle, CO which had clear weather and skies. I also feel the fact that they shot the approach at night in full IMC on a non precision approach contributed to the accident. The error chain occurred when they decided to shoot the approach that close to night, the pilots mistakenly had spotted the runway to the right when it was on the left, using full spoilers even though it is not recommended in the POH, and not reacting to the Ground Proximity Warning System.
What would I do differently if I was in the situation? In their position I do not think I would have continued the approach after hearing the second challenger go missed approach. I am not saying that you can just rely on what others are doing for decisions but the fact of that with it being night and I have never shot the approach into there at night would lead me to follow suit on going missed.
What would I do differently if I was in the situation? In their position I do not think I would have continued the approach after hearing the second challenger go missed approach. I am not saying that you can just rely on what others are doing for decisions but the fact of that with it being night and I have never shot the approach into there at night would lead me to follow suit on going missed.
The question is asked how I would deal with a passenger if my job was on the line. Is the job worth dying for? To be honest I am not sure I can think of single job worth that. If you are PIC then you are PIC and the passenger has to listen. But you will be alive in the end. A passenger is not PIC and when you let them make PIC decisions it is risky road. There is a reason they hire the pilot to fly the plane.